An article on the “Pastor Brian Chilton” website has been brought to our attention because of a quote presented from Jonalyn Grace Fincher, cited as from:
“Defending Femininity: Why Jesus is Good News for Women.” In Apologetics for a New Generation: A Biblically and Culturally Relevant Approach to Talking about God. Edited by Sean McDowell. Eugene: Harvest House, 2009
Before presenting the quote, we are presented with the statement that Charles Taze Russell was the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Anyone truly familiar with Russell’s works would know that Russell was not the founder of any religion, and that he preached against Christians’ usage of an organization like that of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The Jehovah’s Witnesses organization came into existence after Russell died; its real founder was Joseph Rutherford.
Getting back to the quote from Fincher, this quote reads:
Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916) married Maria Frances Ackley with an agreement that their union was a marriage of celibacy for the sake of partnering in their ministry…In their divorce proceedings, Maria testified to witnessing a sexual relationship between her husband and their foster child, Rose Ball, a teenager at the time who worked as Russell’s correspondence secretary” (Fincher 2009, 224).
No charge of incest, child molestation or any other sexual immorality, was ever brought into any court against Brother Russell. Russell’s wife did make a lot of insinuations, and hearsay statements supposedly said to Mrs. Russell implying that he had been inappropriately intimate with a foster-daughter that Mr. Russell and his wife were caring for, but in none of the statements was there any actual charge presented of adultery, child molestation or incest. One newspaper in particular, however, The Daily Brooklyn Eagle, was extremely clever in distorting fact after fact in its hatred toward Russell.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )
One of the JWs has a page on Russell’s marriage which we believe to be very informative. Be aware that the site does preach the JW organization in the other posts, but the information on the post linked to below appears to be accurate and useful.The material is reproduced from the JW Proclaimers book and their 1975 Yearbook, discussing Russell’s marital problems, and the charges his wife brought against. The post brings out that Mrs. Russell denied that she was claiming that Russell had committed adultery.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )